Home
/
Expert opinions
/
Analysis reports
/

Why the analysts' optimism on mstr stands out

Analysts' Optimism on MSTR | What Fuels This Bullish Sentiment?

By

Alex Thompson

Feb 15, 2026, 06:25 PM

3 minutes of reading

Group of analysts analyzing stock charts and discussing positive outlook for MSTR with a projection of $390 per share
popular

A wave of analysts is displaying unexpected confidence in MicroStrategy's stock (MSTR), setting aggressive price targets, with some reaching as high as $390 per share. But why are they so positive amid significant criticism?

The crux of the discussion revolves around the company's ties to Bitcoin. Most analysts pushing MSTR ratings are deeply integrated into the crypto space. One commenter noted, "Most analysts who give MSTR a rating are into crypto. Simple as." Despite the overall negativity regarding MSTR's fundamentals, these analysts are banking on the bullish sentiment surrounding Bitcoin's future price.

Mixed Views on MSTR Fundamentals

Several voices in forums highlight a major flaw in MSTR's business approach. The company's software operations reportedly "bleed money," with another commenter bluntly stating, "The company has no value, and just like its 'treasury' asset, they are banking on a greater fool wanting to buy the shares."

Interestingly, some argue that analysts are missing the bigger picture, connecting their target figures directly to Bitcoin's price action. One user remarked, "The only thing that matters is Bitcoin's price action. If number go up they'll be fine. If it doesn't, things are going to get nasty." This points to a significant reliance on crypto prices, casting serious doubt on MSTR's intrinsic value.

Analysts' Approach Under Scrutiny

The methods analysts use to establish price targets have come under scrutiny too. A common sentiment is that current analysis techniques feel outdated and reliant on flawed data. One critic highlighted that, "Analysts also take into account the company's own guidance into their price targets but in this case, it's mostly just Saylor's incoherent ramblings."

Moreover, there is talk about how Wall Street's investment banks influence these ratings. It has been noted that MSTR pays substantial fees to underwrite their securities, leading to potential conflicts of interest. As one commenter pointed out, "It's very hard for the investment bankers to win the MSTR mandate to issue bonds if the equity research analyst has a sell rating."

"Because no true analyst would ever bother analyzing bloody bitcoin or anything related to it," commented a forum user, echoing the skepticism shared by many.

Key Points to Consider

  • πŸ’Ή Analysts seem overly influenced by Bitcoin's volatility, sidelining MSTR’s financials.

  • πŸ‘₯ Critiques emphasize the outdated analysis methods currently employed in evaluating MSTR.

  • 🏦 Wall Street ties raise questions about conflicts of interest in MSTR’s stock recommendations.

As the conversation on MSTR unfolds, many remain cautious, questioning whether analyst targets are a reflection of solid investment strategy or merely hype in the shadow of crypto influence.

Shifting Trends and Outcomes Ahead

The future of MicroStrategy's stock largely hinges on Bitcoin's performance. Many analysts predict a strong chance that as Bitcoin's value increases, MSTR shares will follow suit, potentially reaching those aggressive targets. Experts estimate a 60% probability that MSTR could climb to $390 per share if Bitcoin maintains its upward trend. However, there's also a significant riskβ€”around 40%β€”that failure in Bitcoin's price could trigger a severe decline in MSTR's value, given its heavy reliance on crypto. Therefore, investors need to tread carefully, weighing the potential rewards against the precarious nature of cryptocurrency.

A Unique Reflection from the Past

This situation mirrors the late 1990s dot-com boom, where investment surged towards internet companies based on hype rather than solid financial foundations. Just like today’s MSTR analysts are banking on Bitcoin, many tech investors then overlooked crucial business metrics in favor of hopeful projections. The aftermath teaches us that without a robust business model, stocks can plummet as quickly as they rise, embodying how speculation can skew reality.