Home
/
Market analysis
/
Market capitalization
/

Exploring the absence of bch et fs compared to ltc

Bitcoin Cash ETF Dilemma | Why LTC is in the Lead

By

Mia Chen

Apr 9, 2025, 09:16 PM

Updated

Apr 14, 2025, 08:21 PM

2 minutes of reading

A visual representation highlighting the disparity between Bitcoin Cash and Litecoin in the ETF market, showcasing market cap comparisons and missing filings.
popular

A lack of movement on Bitcoin Cash (BCH) exchange-traded funds (ETFs) continues to raise questions within the crypto community. While BCH’s market cap is similar to that of Litecoin (LTC), there have been no filings for a BCH ETF yet. Speculation is rampant, pondering the reasons behind this disparity.

A Head-Scratching Disparity

Currently, LTC enjoys the ETF spotlight, while BCH remains sidelined. Analysts observe that BCH's chain is not only older but also rarer due to many coins lost after Bitcoin’s controversial fork. Amid calls for an ETF, many are puzzled by the lack of initiative.

Consequently, a growing number of users have noted recent developments regarding LTC, with comments suggesting that filings for LTC's ETFs are likely to be approved soon in the U.S., further complicating the situation for BCH.

"If there’s demand and comparable market cap, why aren’t we seeing filings?" a trader questioned. This sentiment echoes through the community, with speculation surrounding whether BCH holders possess enough reserves to capitalize fully once an ETF does launch.

Unearthing the Speculative Theories

Three main themes persist regarding BCH's ETF status:

  1. Institutional Reluctance: Certain stakeholders suspect that major players might avoid pursuing an ETF for BCH due to conflicts of interest, much like the Grayscale BCHG fund's behavior.

  2. Price Manipulation Concerns: Whispers of price suppression suggest intentional barriers that keep BCH’s price down, allowing certain entities to profit. "It's all about the whales ready to take retail’s money," commented one user, hinting at the prevailing sentiment.

  3. Regulatory Ambiguity: Despite its similarities to Bitcoin, the perception is that there are hurdles placed to safeguard Bitcoin’s market dominance.

While the community grapples with these themes, the need for clarity remains urgent. Many feel BCH is superior in functionality but wonder why BCH's standing is so low in terms of ETF recognition.

Community Sentiment: Frustrations and Hopes

The ongoing silence surrounding BCH ETF filings has led to increasing frustration among community members. With BCH having a notable following, the emotional stakes are significant. Here's how the crowd stands:

  • Some show optimism with comments like, "We will see a BCH ETF soon!"

  • Others vent outright skepticism about institutional collusion, noting, "They’re suppressing prices as long as possible!"

The mix of enthusiasm and skepticism highlights a divided community regarding BCH's potential.

Key Insights

  • πŸ“ˆ Market Presence: BCH’s similar market cap to LTC raises eyebrows on expected ETF filings.

  • πŸ’Έ Profit Motives: Delay in filings might indicate potential interests clouding the BCHG fund structure.

  • 🚨 Community Alerts: Skepticism permeates the conversations, indicating a critical thinking trend among BCH supporters.

As we await any decisive regulatory or market movements, it seems crucial for BCH holders to remain in the loop. The evolving situation may either see BCH breaking free or staying in LTC's shadow.