Home
/
Crypto news
/
Regulatory changes
/

Bitcoin's reality: centralization vs original idea

Bitcoin's Reality | Centralization vs Original Idea

By

Fatima Zahra

Feb 6, 2026, 07:13 PM

Updated

Feb 7, 2026, 07:20 AM

2 minutes of reading

A split image showing a Bitcoin symbol surrounded by small decentralized nodes on one side and a large corporate building on the other side, representing the clash between decentralization and central...

A growing coalition of people is raising concerns over Bitcoin’s shift from its foundational ideals to a more centralized structure. With mining power concentrated in the hands of a few companies, many are questioning whether Bitcoin truly fulfills its promise of decentralization.

The High Hopes Behind Bitcoin

Bitcoin was initially pitched as a revolution against traditional financial systems. The idea was clear: total decentralization, controlled by ordinary individuals instead of corporations or governments. This model promised freedom and autonomy in a digital world.

The Centralized Landscape Today

However, the reality tells a different story:

  • Mining Power Consolidation: Major mining corporations control much of the Bitcoin network. The top five mining pools hold over half the network’s power. A user noted, "Who really controls it now: whoever has access to Github"

  • Price Manipulation: Centralized exchanges like Binance and Coinbase dictate the market price, resulting in unpredictable fluctuations. A user mentioned, "Price goes from $100k to $50k in no time."

  • Speculation Over Utilization: Instead of being used for daily transactions, Bitcoin is viewed more as a speculative asset. One user stated, "You have to understand intrinsic value"

The Scarcity Factor: Worthless or Valuable?

The original narrative emphasized Bitcoin's scarcity, capped at 21 million coins, likening it to "digital gold." Now, its value seems entirely dependent on public perception and market behavior. If belief wanes, so does its value. Yet, amidst the criticisms, some argue that Bitcoin remains more permissionless and censorship-resistant than traditional money.

What Comes Next?

As the debate continues, people are questioning Bitcoin’s future. Opinions vary widely, with some arguing this is the fate of any innovation. One user provocatively asked, "Then go live in the cave and be absolutely free?"

Key Insights

  • πŸ”’ Major miners control over 50% of the network.

  • πŸ“‰ Speculative trading has overshadowed everyday usage.

  • πŸ’¬ "It’s not failed, it just evolved" - a fresh perspective on Bitcoin's current role.

Forecasting Bitcoin's Trajectory

Looking ahead, Bitcoin is expected to face increased regulatory scrutiny. Experts estimate a 70% chance that governments may impose stricter guidelines on cryptocurrency trading. This could solidify Bitcoin’s role as an asset rather than a transaction currency. Moreover, there's about a 60% likelihood that alternative cryptocurrencies will gain traction, offering more decentralized and utility-focused options.

An Unexpected Echo from the Past

The late 20th-century rise of personal computers reshaped information access. Initially celebrated for democratizing knowledge, many tech giants quickly capitalized on this shift. Bitcoin appears to be following a similar path, with power centralized among a select few, prompting people to reevaluate its original intent.