Edited By
Laura Cheng

A growing number of users are voicing their discontent over the recent update to the Eternl Chrome extension, which many describe as buggy and clunky. After an automatic rollout of Eternl v2, criticisms are emerging, leading to calls for the option to revert to the more user-friendly previous version.
As users dive into the new interface, complaints are surfacing about unexpected glitches and usability issues. The abrupt switch has left many feeling frustratedβsome now longing for the simpler design of the earlier version. Curiously, Eternlβs update seems to have overlooked feedback accrued over months regarding user preferences, igniting discussions across multiple platforms.
In response to the update, comments flood in. Users are not just expressing frustration; they are actively demanding a rollback or at least options for customization. The shift has created a divide, with some advocating for improvements to the existing version while others consider switching to alternative wallet interfaces.
"Some users argue that they canβt effectively manage their ADA with the current bugs. Historical insights hinted at user satisfaction with the previous designs," commented one user. Feelings across the community show a mixβthere's a wide range of sentiment, with many expressing negativity towards the streamlined features of Eternl v2.
Desire for Usability: A significant number of users miss the old interface's ease of use.
Technical Issues: Bugs are frustrating many, prompting a push for better support and reporting channels.
Switching Options: There are suggestions to explore other wallet interfaces that could offer a more stable experience.
"Really, really not a fan of the new Eternl UI compared to the old," echoed a disgruntled user. As the community shares their concerns, the tone remains mostly negative, highlighting the urgency for adjustments or alternatives. The communityβs collective voice seems to resonate: change is needed!
Currently, users are advised to report bugs to respective channels while the team behind Eternl addresses these ongoing issues. Meanwhile, discussions about potential alternatives are gaining traction, placing additional pressure on the developers to act.
"Letβs see if the devs can add a way to use the old UI," expressed a hopeful comment from a user.
π― Users are clamoring for options to revert to the previous version.
π Alternatives to Eternl are being explored by frustrated users.
π Continuous reports confirm a pattern of negativity about v2's functionality.
With ongoing discussions on platforms like Discord, the next steps for the developers remain uncertain. Will a timely response and improvements quell the growing discontent? Only time will tell, but the clock is ticking for the developers of Eternl to regain their users' trust.