Edited By
Jasper Greene
A wave of reactions has emerged as users weigh in on the proposed timelines for upcoming adjustments to the proof format. Discussions suggest potential activation around 256 days for older plots to phase out, leaving some users anxious about their options.
Changes in the proof format could have wide-reaching impacts. Discussions on various forums indicate growing concern regarding transition protocols, with many users contemplating their next steps.
Timing of Transition: Users forecast a shift in activity around early 2026, with one noting, "I think that means I could completely ignore this until New Years and still barely replot in time :)" However, others express frustration, stating "I was hoping for replot of Jan 2026, but late 2026 works I guess."
Transition Period Conflicts: A heated debate has emerged over the proposed 32-day transition period. One contributor argued, "The transition period should be estimated with slow plot speed, not standard plot speed existing farms are left as they are, but plot slowly on another PC." This highlights differing perspectives on farming capabilities.
Efficiency of Current Systems: Some maintain that transitioning might not be as smooth as anticipated due to the limitations of older systems. Users voiced that larger farms have GPUs, but those using CPUs could struggle, noting, "For a properly configured farm, a GPU cannot farm old plots and create new plots at the same time."
Comment sentiments are mixed, illustrating both hope and skepticism about the proposal. While many see potential benefits, the fears of disruption and operational hiccups overshadow optimism. Users are concerned about maintaining operational efficiency during the transition, signaling a need for clarity from developers.
*"This sets a dangerous precedent" - Top-voted comment.
π Users suggest activation may happen in mid-2026.
π Ongoing debates around the transition period highlight diverse farming realities.
β οΈ Concerns arise from slower plotting methods compared to standard practices.
In summary, as proposed timelines solidify, the community's apprehension reflects a broader uncertainty in the landscape of proof format changes. Will user concerns lead to revisions in the timeline? Only time will tell.
As the proposed changes approach, many users are likely to see mixed results regarding their farming setups. With approximately a 70% probability, experts estimate that significant adjustments to the transition process may emerge after further discussions within the community. Itβs plausible that functionality updates will be rolled out during the anticipated transition periods, leading to smoother operations than current sentiment suggests. However, the uncertainty surrounding older systems might lead to operational strife, especially for those caught between adapting to new methods and maintaining existing frameworks. Users should brace for a 30% likelihood that delays could push activation well into late 2026, prompting the community to seek more guidance from developers.
Consider the evolution from DVDs to digital streaming, a shift that mirrored todayβs crypto community upheaval. Initially, many movie collections fell out of favor, with users hesitant to let go of physical copies. Yet, as streaming gained traction, a small group transitioned early, reaping benefits while others clung to outdated formats. The parallel lies in how change can disrupt comfort but also yield substantial long-term advantages. Just as early adopters of streaming enjoyed smoother viewing experiences, those who embrace the new crypto proof formats could find themselves at the forefront of an emerging landscape, even if it means navigating a shaky transition first.