Edited By
David Wong

As interest in the Cosmos ecosystem grows, questions about other hubs within this blockchain landscape emerge. A recent thread highlights user confusion, sparking debate over the existence and roles of hubs beyond the well-established Cosmos Hub.
The discussion revolves around the concept of a "hub and spoke" model, where multiple zones could supposedly connect and interact through shared hubs. One user expressed a desire to clarify the presence of these hubs, stating, "I never saw any hubs besides the cosmos hub."
Several significant points sprang up in users' comments:
Hub and Spoke Model: The notion that different zones could operate through common hubs raises curiosity. However, many users note a lack of clarity and examples beyond the Cosmos Hub itself.
Osmosis as a Recognized Meeting Point: While some users argue that Osmosis serves as the main intersection of various projects, it is viewed primarily as a Layer 1 solution rather than a hub.
Demand for Clear Communication: Users are seeking definitive answers on what role these other hubs might play within the ecosystem, urging for more information on potential hubs.
"Cosmos IS the hub. No other hubs."
β A user asserting the dominance of the Cosmos Hub.
The conversation shows a mix of confusion and skepticism, particularly regarding what function these unidentified hubs serve alongside the Cosmos Hub. Users seem eager for more clarity on the ecosystem's organization.
π Hubs Remain Unclear: No established alternative hubs have gained recognition beside the Cosmos Hub.
β‘ Osmosis Seen as a Key Player: Some view Osmosis as the central point where projects converge, yet it does not align with the traditional hub classification.
π Clarity Needed: Users are strongly advocating for better communication about the roles of emerging hubs within the Cosmos ecosystem.
This ongoing discussion underscores the evolving nature of the Cosmos ecosystem and a clear demand for greater transparency from its leaders. As more people engage with this rapidly developing platform, the quest for understanding gets sharper.
Thereβs a strong chance weβll see clearer definitions of alternative hubs within the Cosmos ecosystem by late 2026. As user discussions grow more heated, it's likely that ecosystem leaders will respond to calls for transparency. Experts estimate around a 70% probability that new developments will emerge, potentially leading to the official recognition of alternative hubs like Osmosis. If the momentum continues, we could also witness strategic partnerships aimed at strengthening inter-zone connectivity and communication, perhaps seeing even a rise in collaborative projects that exemplify the "hub and spoke" model beyond the Cosmos Hub.
Consider the early days of the internet in the 1990s, where confusion over protocols and the role of different websites was rampant. Early internet users faced numerous questions about navigating various domains and networks, similar to the Cosmos community's current uncertainty about hubs. Just as the internet flourished through better communication and structure, the Cosmos ecosystem may also transform as better-defined roles for hubs are established. In both scenarios, clarity and collaboration could be the keys to unlocking broader participation and innovation.