Home
/
Community engagement
/
Forums
/

Understanding image validation for id verification

Image Validation Issues | What's Needed for ID Verification

By

Omar Farooq

Apr 20, 2025, 07:49 AM

Edited By

Ethan Walker

Updated

Apr 22, 2025, 05:41 AM

Just a minute read

A person holds an identification card while looking at a smartphone displaying a live image, comparing the two for verification.

A growing community of validators is tackling the challenges of accurately verifying identities via image comparison. Recent discussions highlighted the need for clearer standards, with many contributors urging better practices and resources in various forums.

The Heart of Image Validation

Image validation centers on comparing a live image to an ID photo. One contributor explained, "All you need to do is make sure that the person on the right side image is the same person as seen on the ID card image on the left side." This underlines ongoing frustrations regarding inconsistent validation criteria.

Identifying Key Themes from Validators

The community shared strategies for improving accuracy, revealing critical points:

  • Facial Features Matter: Validators advised focusing on distinct facial features like moles and dimples. "Spot the obvious features of the person on the right," a user suggested, emphasizing their significance.

  • Aging Complicates Validation: The impact of aging can hinder accurate matches. Participants suggested focusing on features that typically endure as people age, enhancing consistency.

  • Need for Resources: One comment stressed, "KYC validators could use a resource kit with information such as how to 'age' people from their ID pic." This points to a strong demand for additional guidance.

Community Sentiment on Image Validation

A contributor shared, "I wish I could use Google Translate on the app because sometimes names appear in Arabic." This reflects a broader need for accessibility in the verification process. Meanwhile, tensions appeared over feedback on validation results. "You don’t get the result of your validation at once," one user noted, raising concerns about fairness among validators.

"There's room for better guidelines that could benefit everyone involved," said another community member.

Key Insights from the Discussion

  • 🌟 Many find enjoyment in validating, despite occasional mistakes.

  • πŸ” Attention to specific physical features aids successful matches.

  • ⚠️ A call for better resources and clearer standards resonates.

As these discussions continue, the community seeks collaborative efforts to enhance the ID verification process, aiming for consistency and accuracy in the face of evolving challenges.