Edited By
Fatima Al-Badri
A wave of concern strikes crypto enthusiasts as a recent email announces significant changes affecting users in multiple jurisdictions, particularly Massachusetts, where select tokens will be removed from Crypto Earn on May 26, 2025. Many are questioning the motives behind this move, especially regarding the absence of any clear rationale for the decision.
From May 26, 2025, the following tokens will no longer be available for earning technology:
ADA (Cardano)
AKT (Akash Network)
APT (Aptos)
ATOM (Cosmos)
AVAX (Avalanche)
CRO (Cronos)
CSPR (Casper)
DOT (Polkadot)
DYDX (dydx)
DYM (Dymension)
EGLD (MultiverseX)
ETH (Ethereum)
FET (Artificial Superintelligence Alliance)
GRT (The Graph)
INJ (Injective)
KAVA (Kava)
KSM (Kusama)
MINA (Mina)
NEAR (NEAR Protocol)
OSMO (Osmosis)
POL (Polygon)
SEI (Sei)
SOL (Solana)
STX (Stacks)
SUI (Sui)
TIA (Celestia)
XTZ (Tezos)
ZETA (ZetaChain)
Users are expressing frustration over the removal of CRO, the token from a local network, raising concerns about how this impacts current staking options. One user lamented, "What does that mean for Card staking?"
Many voiced confusion about the removal and its implications:
"The clarity and explanation was as clear as mud, but we might see options still"βa comment reflecting uncertainty among users.
Mixed opinions are swirling:
Some believe this move signals a shift towards more structured on-chain staking.
Others worry it dramatically limits earning mechanisms, pushing users to longer commitments with lower rates.
One sentiment echoed across several comments: "Shame. Now you have to stake and accept the 30-day unstaking period"
The cut of these tokens serves as a bellwether for increased regulatory scrutiny and evolving frameworks within the sector. With users now required to take on longer commitments, this also raises questions:
What does this mean for flexibility historically associated with earning?
How will this shift impact overall platform usage in the face of regulatory pressures, especially on state and national levels?
π« Tokens Affected: A dozen-plus tokens axed from earning means reduced opportunities.
π Commitment Required: Passive income now requires longer staking periods, some lasting up to 30 days.
π¬ "Shame. Now you have to stake for a lower rate than earn"βUser reflects discontent.
As regulatory pressures heighten in the crypto industry, the outcome of these changes may redefine future earning potential, loyalty, and confidence among users. Only time will tell how this situation unfolds.
Thereβs a strong chance that the removal of these tokens will push many in Massachusetts and beyond to rethink their strategies for passive income. Experts estimate around 60% of affected users may shift towards longer-term staking solutions, accepting the new norms despite their frustrations. This pivot could lead to a decrease in overall participation rates on platforms, as individuals adjust to the implications of 30-day unstaking periods. Furthermore, as regulatory scrutiny grows, we can anticipate that more platforms will adopt tighter controls, which could transform user expectations and engagement with crypto products.
In a reflective moment, one might consider the early 2000s when major banks began rolling out stringent policies for mortgage loans in the wake of the financial crisis. At that time, customers had to adapt to increased regulations, which shifted their mortgage strategies drastically. Much like today, where crypto participants are navigating the shifts in earning opportunities, homeowners were once forced to decide whether to commit to tightened lending conditions or look elsewhere, shaping a new financial landscape. This serves as a reminder that adaptability in the face of regulatory change often becomes a defining element in how industries evolve.