Home
/
Expert opinions
/
Opinion editorials
/

Can we truly separate money from the state?

The Push for Monetary Independence | Advocates Demand a Shift from State Control

By

Mohammed Aziz

Jun 1, 2026, 02:19 PM

Edited By

Jasper Greene

Updated

Jun 1, 2026, 02:56 PM

2 minutes of reading

A group of diverse people discussing ideas about money and resources at a roundtable, with a globe and charts on the table representing economic models.

A growing coalition is rallying for the separation of money from state control. This movement supports abolishing income tax while pushing for an economy based on physical resources. Recent discussions reveal ongoing challenges related to wealth gaps and purchasing power loss.

Key Points: A Flawed Economic Model

Advocates highlight three critical issues:

  1. Eroded Purchasing Power: Years of inflation have significantly reduced the value of fiat currencies, especially impacting young individuals and low-income earners who struggle to enter housing markets.

  2. Infinite Growth Trap: The demand for constant economic expansion fosters a throwaway culture while overlooking the planet's limited resources.

  3. Inequitable Taxation: Workers face burdensome income taxes, while the wealthy evade their fair share through loopholes and tax havens.

The Three Pillars of The Movement

Pillar 1: Honest Money

A proposed system based on currencies with a fixed cap, like Bitcoin, aims to end the cycle of debt manipulation by banks. "Saved money should grow in value over time," argue supporters.

Pillar 2: The Resource Fee

Instead of income tax, the plan introduces fees based on environmental and material impacts. Landowners would face fees reflecting the desirability of their property, while luxury item purchases incur higher charges, promoting responsible consumption.

Pillar 3: A Strong Welfare State

Funds from the Resource Fee would support essential services like healthcare and education, ensuring government accountability as financial manipulation becomes impossible.

Addressing Critique: Insights from Recent Comments

Commenters on various platforms have raised pointed critiques and perspectives:

  • One user emphasized that solutions go beyond currency reform, addressing systemic issues like the erosion of union power and stagnant minimum wages. They argued, "Nothing an alternate money system can fix."

  • Another noted that the current inflationary environment benefits wealthier demographics by making it challenging for others to accumulate savings: "Money flows straight into stock and housing markets, locking out the young."

Implications and Future Outlook

The transition to this proposed system will take time, with experts forecasting gradual changes in taxation over the coming decade as debates continue. Proponents suggest that if awareness of this movement grows, certain regions may pilot resource-based taxation sooner rather than later.

Key Takeaways

  • β–³ Years of inflation have seriously hurt purchasing power for many.

  • β–½ The focus on infinite growth is at odds with sustainable practices.

  • β€» "A balanced budget amendment may be more effective than alternative currencies" - a sentiment shared in recent discussions.

As the quest for economic independence continues, the movement asks whether a successful separation of money from state control could lead to a more equitable and sustainable future.