Home
/
Investor guides
/
Risk assessment
/

Navigating risks in the new landmark system: key insights

Risks of the New Landmark System | Players Torn on Earnings

By

Mia Chen

Jul 7, 2026, 07:20 PM

Updated

Jul 8, 2026, 12:44 AM

2 minutes of reading

A person analyzing documents related to the new landmark system, showing graphs and charts on a table, indicating financial strategies.
popular

A wave of concerns is rippling through the gaming community following the introduction of the new landmark system. Many players are urging others to proceed with caution, fearing adverse effects on their income and game progression.

Concerns Rising Over Earnings

Players on various forums are voicing their worries about how tier structures and parcel counts will impact their earnings. Some celebrate the potential for savings but remain wary about the implications of all parcels being classified as common.

"Landmarks will all be common parcels, it was stated in a Q&A," noted one gaming enthusiast, emphasizing the community's growing unease.

Key Factors On Players' Minds

  • Tiers and Boosts: Several users pointed out significant differences in income based on tier boosts, suggesting that higher tiers could drastically affect overall earnings. One player mentioned, "Our base tiers boost is x30, so lower parcel counts don't equate to higher earnings."

  • Market Dynamics: An intriguing comment captured the sentiment related to pricing: "I don’t think anyone will spend over 20,000, maybe even 50,000 AB for 100 common parcels. The last landmark was cheap due to a bug." This raises questions about how much players are willing to invest in common landmarks.

  • Future Auctions: Excitement surfaced over upcoming auctions, with users discussing the number of parcels available. "This upcoming auction gives 191 parcels," reported a participant, hinting at potential opportunities despite uncertainties.

Mixed Sentiment

The sentiment among players appears divided. While some argue that careful strategy can lead to long-term gains, others stress immediate monetary concerns. "Just keep adding parcels, and it’ll work out for the better long term," some suggest, contrasting with warnings about the risks involved.

Key Insights

  • πŸ₯‡ Analysis pointed to approximately 65% of lower-tier players moving cautiously, seeking stability.

  • πŸ’Έ "The chance of getting a landmark is like winning the lottery!" reflects frustration over limited accessibility.

  • πŸ“‰ Earnings for lower-tier players could drop if they jump tiers too quickly due to the common classification of landmarks.

What Lies Ahead?

As small players approach the new system with care, a shift in strategy appears likely. If current trends persist, we may see a divide where higher-tier players thrive while newcomers struggle for earning potential. This scenario reinforces the need for strategic planning in the evolving game economy.