Home
/
Crypto news
/
Regulatory changes
/

Trump's genius act prohibits interest on stablecoins

Trump’s GENIUS Act | Stablecoins Hit Hard as Interest Payments Banned

By

Davina Nguyen

Jul 7, 2025, 08:35 PM

2 minutes of reading

Illustration showing Trump holding a document labeled GENIUS Act while stablecoins are depicted with a crossed-out interest symbol.
popular

A recent legislative move by President Trump has stirred up heated discussions among crypto enthusiasts. The GENIUS Act, which prohibits stablecoins from paying interest, has been met with widespread criticism, reflecting the discontent of many people who feel this decision undermines their financial well-being.

What Does This Mean for Stablecoin Holders?

The ban on interest payments effectively transforms stablecoins into mere digital cash, stripping them of financial benefits usually associated with cryptocurrency holdings. Many people are expressing concern that inflation will erode the value of their stablecoins, leading to potential financial losses.

"For Americans holding stablecoins is worse than holding actual dollars," stated a prominent commenter. This sentiment resonates with many who feel that the government is stifling economic opportunities through regulation.

Public Outcry: A Voice for Change

Comments from various forums highlight frustration with the Trump administration’s approach to crypto policy. Some people assert:

  • "Anything to keep people down. When will people realize Trump will pass no legislation that helps everyday people?"

  • "Yeah - all his promises were hype without substance."

This reflects a growing disenchantment with the government's failure to deliver on promises made to constituents.

Central Banks Debate

Central banks are grappling with the implications of this legislation. The challenge is clear: if stablecoins generate interest, they are viewed as financial instruments and require regulation. If not, they operate similarly to cash, needing less oversight. This is an ongoing conversation that could shape the future of digital currencies.

Key Points to Consider

  • πŸ”’ Banning interest payments: The new law curtails financial growth opportunities.

  • πŸ”₯ Public sentiment: Many see this as another blow to the average American's financial future.

  • πŸ“Š Inflation impact: Concerns that the ban could worsen the impact of inflation on savings.

In this climate, many wonder: Are regulators too far removed from the realities faced by everyday Americans in the crypto market? As these policies unfold, only time will tell how they will shape the landscape of cryptocurrency and digital finance.

Stay tuned for more updates as people continue to voice their concerns about the limitations imposed by the GENIUS Act.

What Lies Ahead for Crypto Enthusiasts

As the GENIUS Act's impacts settle in, many experts anticipate a pronounced shift in the crypto landscape. There's a strong chance that stablecoin adoption will drop as holders seek better alternatives for interest earnings, particularly if inflation rises. Analysts predict around a 25% decrease in stablecoin transactions over the next year, as financial growth opportunities dwindle. Additionally, frustrations may drive more people toward lobbying efforts for regulatory changes, possibly leading to a push for new legislation that might ease restrictions on stablecoin offerings. This ongoing tension between innovation and regulation is poised to define discussions in the financial sector for the foreseeable future.

A Slice of History: Lessons from Prohibition

Looking back, an interesting parallel can be drawn to Prohibition in the 1920s. Just as the government sought to regulate alcohol, pushing it underground and creating illicit markets, today's restrictions on stablecoins could prompt crypto enthusiasts to adopt decentralized platforms beyond regulatory reach. As people turned to speakeasies for their fix, today's users might find innovative ways around the law, fostering new ecosystems that challenge established norms. This historical event reminds us that attempts to strictly limit financial tools often backfire, inspiring alternative pathways that could redefine the landscape.