Edited By
Sofia Petrov
A recent experience shared by an investor highlights serious problems with using Metamask Snaps for cryptocurrency transactions. Users are urged to approach such extensions with skepticism after the investorβs funds tragically vanished following the use of the Cosmos Extension.
For six months, a user explored various altcoins and stumbled upon a project associated with Cosmos and Osmosis. Wanting to continue using Metamask, they installed a Snap extension and bridged funds over, only to find they were missing afterwards.
The individual reported that after bridging their funds, they couldnβt view their balance unless they had specific tokens. This lack of transparency created confusion. They noted, "It feels like my money is gone for good."
After reaching out to various support channels including moderators and developers from both platforms, the user learned the extension's connection was more complex than anticipated. They highlighted, "This snap thing is tied to your scrt wallet and not your private key."
Several forum commentators echoed caution about installed extensions, especially those lacking transparency.
"Did you check the developer of the snap?" one commenter pointed out, warning that the Cosmos team didn't create it.
Another echoed the sentiment, advising others to avoid dubious extensions: "Stay away from crypto if youβre just going to install sketchy extensions."
π An increasing number of reports warn against using unverified wallet extensions.
β οΈ Users report significant losses when bridging funds through these tools.
π‘ "This sets a dangerous precedent" - A concerned community member.
Financial literacy in cryptocurrency remains crucial. As this story suggests, itβs vital to conduct due diligence before using any crypto tools, especially those tied to personal wallets. What does it take for the crypto community to push for safer practices?